Padilla Indictment a Complete Joke; Media Duped Again

Padilla Indictment a Complete Joke

It looks as if the federal government has screwed-up again. For three -years we all thought that Jose Padilla was being held as an enemy combatant, with no legal rights as declared by the president, because he had planned to ignite a “dirty bomb” in the streets of an American city and blow-up apartments buildings. The public was led to believe that he was such a serious threat that he could not be trusted in the American criminal justice system. Rather, fearing what would happen in our court system, the Bush Administration fought bitterly through the courts to keep Padilla held as an enemy combatant with no legal rights even though he is an American citizen showing their contempt for the courts in the process.

From the beginning everyone who was watching closely knew this case was about precedent; Bush wanted to show us that he had the right to hold American citizens with no due process if he deemed them to be enemy combatants. No need for all of the formalities and precedent it was time to go back to the days of the Wild West where the sheriff could be the judge, jury and executioner. While critics thought that this action was draconian and un-American, we at least thought that Padilla was being held on strong evidence and the media had all but convicted him of the dirty-bomb plot. Well, it turns out that the Padilla case belongs right along with the WMD case in Iraq and other blunders of this administration.

Having its hand forced by the prospect of an upcoming negative court ruling the federal government finally issued an indictment against Padilla and gave him his day in court. Strangely, this man who was supposedly dining with bin Laden, a full fledged al-Qaeda member, and a dirty bomber was not charged with any of those things.

What was he charged with? Padilla was charged with training in a camp in Afghanistan to go and fight against the brutal Russian invasion of Chechnya; that is hardly terrorism, maybe naive and foolish, but not terrorism. A major difference exists between those who seek to physically defend oppressed Muslims by military means from invading armies and those who seek to bomb and kill innocent civilians.

The government also alleges that Padilla was a part of a cell, and what did this so-called cell supposedly do? They raised money to give to charities helping suffering Muslims in Chechnya, Bosnia, and Kosovo. Since when did donated to those in need become terrorism? Of course the government alleges (more than likely falsely based on the evidence) that some of the charities had connections to terrorism, and some have been shut down; but since when did the onus come on the donator? Donations sent to these charities were given with the intention of helping orphans, widows and the distressed; the Muslims who I know that donated to these charities didn’t even connect their giving to the political situations in these areas or any political groups. Will all of the hundreds of thousands of American-Muslims who donated to these charities be prosecuted?

If this is all the government has then a great injustice has been committed against Padilla, and those around him, and this will only add to the growing amount of injustices that this government has perpetrated against its Muslim citizens. However, living in the climate we are in (where men such as Sheikh Ali al-Timimi are serving life in prison for having a unique opinion) I have no doubt that if Padilla and the rest of the brothers go to trial they will be convicted; that is American justice under the Bush Administration.

Let this also be a lesson to all American-Muslims; beware of the knock at the door in the middle of the night. We are no longer safe and we are no longer free. We are living under siege.

On a final note it is interesting to see why Padilla was charged with this and not John Walker Lindh. Lindh kept his white privilege even as he fought alongside the Taliban (whom I despised). Americans said he was naïve and misguided (hardly the case, but he was no terrorist either) and Padilla is a Puerto Rican ex-gang member that could strike the fear into white Americas hearts and be so easily vilified in the mainstream media and was made into an unsympathetic character. The media looked at Padilla and decided not to give him any benefits of the doubt and the Bush Administration knew that is precisely what would happen. Call Padilla the anti-Chalaby; call the media duped twice.


17 thoughts on “Padilla Indictment a Complete Joke; Media Duped Again

  1. That’s why I write a blog devoted to media criticism.

    Actually what they finally are doing with Padilla is an admission of failure by the Bush regime. They are starting to realize they can’t continue to get away with this “enemy combatant” b.s.

  2. “This is the same American media that will not let any Muslim voices be heard unless you are an irhsad mandji or Asra Nomani type.”

    That’s becaue most muslims are evil, head-chopping, jihadi wannabees…

  3. A great article as usual akhi. My only complaint; I don’t think it’s fair to lump Nomani and Manji. While I’m not a huge fan of Nomani’s take on Islam, she seems to mean well and genuinely be sticking with Islam as she understands it. Manji….well, I ranted on her at Abu Sinan’s blog. Suffice it to say, I don’t even think she’s a Muslim. And she has no interest in reform within the Islamic world, her interest is in toadying towards neoliberals.

  4. I think for the Washington Post to include you on their article’s webpage, you have to mention the Post by name (so that it’s picked up by Technorati). You didn’t do that in this entry. I’ve written about other Washington Post articles in the past, and didn’t have any problems in getting a link on the article’s webpage.

  5. >>That’s becaue most muslims are evil, head-chopping, jihadi wannabees…< < This is just plain wrong. You need to get ass kicked for making such a false and hateful statement. Who the fuck are you anyway? Based on your mental limitations, I’d gather that you support mass murder like the war in Iraq…so what are you complaining about head choppings for?
    What an absolute piece of shit, somebody give him a swift kick in the ballsack.

  6. For the record I will just say that while I strongly disagree with Asma Normani, and am partially upset by her absurd promotion that a small Muslim group in Spain (which she was a part of) was the first to issue a fatwa against bin Laden, I do think that she has good-intentions and is a good writer unlike Manji who is a political-lackey, terrible writer and someone I don’t even consider to be a Muslim.

  7. Salam Aliakum Umar,
    Nomani is really not so different from Manji. Both apeared at some stupid event as speakers on Arab woman….without any Arab woman in the panel. Both have ties to jewish extremist and zionist terrorist groups, Nomani being far more cautious about her links then Manji. Nomani contrary to popular opinion doesnt mind patriarchy as long as it works for her….eg- demanding to do whatever she wants at the morgantown masjid because her father was a financial contributer.

  8. >>What’s false or hateful about telling the truth?< < You think labelling 1.6 billion people as evil is “telling the truth”? Tell me, are you living in a shack in Alabama? You sound like one of them muthafuckaz who go around burning crosses in peoples lawns.
    BTW asshole, I’m not a Muslim.
    As I stated earliar you need to get your ass kicked and beaten to a pump like any nazi asswipe. If you had balls you wouldnt be talking shit with a name like “flanstein” would you bitch? Fuck off already.

  9. Umar,

    What do you disagree with Asra Nomani about?

    And what are the jewish extremist groups she’s allegedly affiliated with?

  10. Thanks for proving that you indeed are a racist “anonymous” or should I say “flanstein”?
    You are a seriously fucked up individual…you need to get off your next of kin and join the human race. You’ve also proven that you have no testicles…for posting under 2 different log-ins. Too bad abortion wasnt legal when you were forcefully conceived in the barn.

  11. Elizabeth,

    It was others who said she is affiliated with Jewish extremist groups; personally I have no knowledge of that although I know that others, such as Manji, are routinely being promoted by neo-cons. The problem I have is that she represents an extreme opinion within the Muslim community and she can, and others like her, get easy access to the mainstream American media. While at the same time the media has blackballed mainstream Muslims and Muslim leadership. There are only two Muslim voices that can be heard in the American media and those are fanatical terrorist voices and then so-called “progressive” Muslims and neither of these camps constitute a significant percentage of the Muslim community anywhere I also think, for example the whole fatwa against bin Laden in Spain, was an absurd publicity stunt that reinforced the lie that Muslims have never condemned bin Laden or terrorism before when she should have know better.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s